Blog
Use of Consulting Physicians/Medical Directors: Practical Issues
The following article is about practical aspects of agreements with Medical Directors who also make referrals to homecare providers.
Please do not hesitate to contact us with comments, questions, or requests for additional information.
Sincerely,
Elizabeth
Elizabeth E. Hogue, Esq.
(877) 871-4062
Please do not hesitate to contact us with comments, questions, or requests for additional information.
Sincerely,
Elizabeth
Elizabeth E. Hogue, Esq.
(877) 871-4062
Marketing strategies utilized by post-acute providers are generating fierce competition for referrals! As a result, providers are appropriately committing more and more resources to developing their services. Providers, for example, are entering into agreements with referring physicians to provide consulting services to their organizations. These legitimate relationships may be misunderstood by referral sources, such as case managers/discharge planners, who may be uncertain about whether it is legal or ethical to refer patients to providers who have these types of arrangements. First, it is important to acknowledge that post-acute providers need consulting physicians' services. Examples of services that are genuinely needed from a business perspective may include the following:
It is certainly appropriate for providers to establish consulting relationships with physicians who also make referrals to the providers with whom they have these types of arrangements. Of course, these types of arrangements raise important legal issues related to potential violations of the federal anti-kickback statute (AKS), the federal so-called Stark laws, and state statutes that are likely to be similar to these federal statutes. Providers are likely to avoid violations if they meet the requirements of the personal services “safe harbor” under the AKS and the contractual exception under the Stark laws. The safe harbor and exception generally require providers to pay consulting physicians who also make referrals to them based upon written agreements that require payments at fair market value for services actually rendered without regard to the volume or value of referrals received. The Office of the Inspector General (OIG) of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) continues to scrutinize these types of relationships carefully. From a practical point of view, therefore, providers should do the following in addition to meeting the requirements described above:
Providers are more likely to avoid enforcement activities when they follow these practical guidelines. Violations hurt providers and referral sources alike. Expenditures of financial and other resources to get it right are certainly justified in view of the possible adverse consequences. ©2021 Elizabeth E. Hogue, Esq. All rights reserved. No portion of this material may be reproduced in any form without the advance written permission of the author. |
Comments
There have been no comments made on this article. Why not be the first and add your own comment using the form below.
Leave a comment
Commenting is restricted to members only. Please login now to submit a comment.